In his auto
biography, "My American Journey," former Joint Chief of Staff
Chairman General Colin L. Powell has mentioned
several tests to determine when the nation should commit to battle:
Commit only if vital interests are at stake.
If committing, do so with
all the resources necessary to win.
Go in only with clear
objectives.
Be flexible to match the
commitment to the objectives, as objectives change.
Only take on commitments
that have the support of those who must bear the burden.
Commit forces only as a
last resort.
Vital Interests: An employee has left with vital trade secrets. A former
partner has left with the cash of the business. These are emergencies that
demand an immediate response. Usually, though, the threat is less clear. A
former employee has left, in a hurry, but the reason for leaving is unknown.
The question of a vital interest depends on the situation. An attorney can help
assess the situation and suggest solutions short of litigation.
Necessary
Resources: Sticker Shock. Even well-off clients are stunned by the resources
necessary for litigation. In California, the costs of some intellectual
property disputes are covered under general business liability insurance
policies as "advertising injury." Some business principals may have
personal liabilities covered by their home general liability insurance. Some
contracts provide that one side will indemnify the other for certain actions.
The first question after "what happened?" should usually be,
"what insurance policies might be available to cover it?" Even if no
one indemnifies you, there are other ways to curb costs.
The first is to
take precautions to prevent the dispute from occurring. An attorney is most
cost-effective when a relationship is being formed. Ignoring the potential for
disputes compounds their destructive capability. Cheaper alternatives to
full-blown litigation, such as mediation or arbitration, can not only lower the
cost of a dispute, but also keep the relationship intact.
Attorneys can also structure contracts to lower the costs to the prevailing
party when a dispute occurs. The "American" rule is that litigants
pay their own attorneys' fees. However, if parties agree, the winner may get
attorneys' fees also.
Litigation
requires active participation of management. Employees up and down the chain
have to be consulted on the facts, called to deposition, review papers, or
otherwise be taken away from more profitable pursuits. There are also
intangible costs. Litigation strains relationships, especially when the
combatants are formerly close associates. People caught in the middle have
their loyalties sorely tested, and respond by avoiding both sides.
Specific Objectives. Deciding the objectives of litigation is difficult.
Crushing the opposition can be rarely achieved at low cost. Reaching an
objective in litigation means knowing what is possible. Civil courts cannot put
people in jail. Forcing a person back to work is very rare. Some outcomes such
as preventing someone from benefiting from your labors is easily achievable. In
most cases, only a monetary solution will work. A litigant must balance the
size and prospect of the award against the costs of achieving that award.
Judges and juries often take a view different from that of either litigant.
There is never more than an 80 percent chance of winning.
Preparing to Change Objectives. Litigation, like war, is never static. A
litigant must always be prepared to change the means and the goals. Documents
supporting the case are never found. New case law alters the field of battle.
Witnesses cannot be found, or will not get involved.
Good litigants
are ready for these ups and downs. If the million dollar award no longer looks
so certain, be prepared to take a more modest, but certain settlement offer.
Alternatively, a defendant may avoid later costs and risks by making a more
modest offer early on. These ups and downs are part of the ride.Support to the
End. Litigation's initial "rush" can be invigorating. Significant
cases now take about eighteen months to reach a courtroom - much faster than
before, but still a long time. The initial reasons for the litigation are often
forgotten in the meantime.
Litigation as a
Last Resort. Litigation is too expensive to be the first reaction to any
crisis. Often, those interests can be served through litigation's alternatives.
Litigation should be considered only once the alternatives are ruled out.
|